H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs M. Petchey H2H: 0-1
M. Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Petchey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, M. Petchey won the 1996 Nottingham fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | M. Petchey | 6-3 6-4 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | M. Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |