H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Mats Wilander H2H: 1-2
Mats Wilander holds a 2–1 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 1996 New Haven second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1996* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 6-4 | Mats Wilander | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1996* | Bermuda | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 7-6(0) 6-3 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mats Wilander | 6-2 6-2 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |