H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Mauricio Hadad H2H: 0-1
Mauricio Hadad holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mauricio Hadad leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mauricio Hadad won the 1996 Australian Open second round 7-6(5) 6-4 2-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mauricio Hadad | 7-6(5) 6-4 2-2 (ret.) | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Mauricio Hadad | #1,378 | #78 | 565 | 1,734 | 43 | 49 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Mauricio Hadad | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #126 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #103 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #124 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #500 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |