H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Neil Borwick H2H: 2-0
Patrick Rafter holds a 2–0 lead over Neil Borwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 1994 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 58
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | Neil Borwick | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1993* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Patrick Rafter | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Neil Borwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Neil Borwick | #1,150 | #104 | 441 | 1,661 | 25 | 50 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Neil Borwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #597 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1992 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #176 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #112 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1994 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #242 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |