H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 3-0
Patrick Rafter holds a 3–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2000 Canada Masters fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-4 6-2 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Patrick Rafter | 6-7(5) 3-6 6-1 6-3 6-2 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1997* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 7-5 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |