H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Patrick Rafter vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 5-1

Patrick Rafter holds a 5–1 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2000 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patrick Rafter
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Patrick Rafter #21 6-3 6-3 6-4 Todd Woodbridge #171 Match data
Jan 15, 1998* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Patrick Rafter #2 6-4 6-3 Todd Woodbridge #33 Match data
Jul 2, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Todd Woodbridge #37 6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(6) 6-3 Patrick Rafter #17 Match data
Apr 19, 1997* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Patrick Rafter #39 6-4 7-6(3) Todd Woodbridge #33 Match data
Apr 12, 1997* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Patrick Rafter #43 6-3 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #32 Match data
Jan 5, 1995* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Patrick Rafter #20 7-6(3) 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,857 237 229 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patrick Rafter Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,702 0 0
21 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1 1992 25–22 53.2% #54 1,684 0 0
22 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,664 0 0
23 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,661 0 0
24 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,810 0 1
25 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8 1996 32–23 58.2% #36 1,744 0 1
26 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,796 0 2
27 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,714 0 2
28 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,601 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,596 0 2