H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patrik Kuhnen vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-1
Patrik Kuhnen and Gilad Bloom are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1992 Taipei quarterfinal 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1992* | Taipei | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Patrik Kuhnen | 6-0 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Gilad Bloom | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrik Kuhnen | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |