H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrik Kuhnen vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-1
Patrik Kuhnen and John Fitzgerald are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on carpet, while John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1992 Taipei fourth round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1992* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Patrik Kuhnen | 6-0 6-1 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1992* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Fitzgerald | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrik Kuhnen | John Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |