H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Patrik Kuhnen vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-1

Patrik Kuhnen and John Fitzgerald are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on carpet, while John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1992 Taipei round of 16 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patrik Kuhnen
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patrik Kuhnen #98 6-0 6-1 John Fitzgerald #164 Match data Oct 23, 1992* R16 Taipei ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
John Fitzgerald #139 3-6 7-5 6-3 Patrik Kuhnen #104 Match data Apr 3, 1992* R16 Singapore ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patrik Kuhnen #1,341 #43 574 1,789 126 151 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patrik Kuhnen John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0
20 1986 1–3 25.0% #170 1,508 0 0 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1987 10–12 45.5% #83 1,582 0 0 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2
22 1988 16–16 50.0% #61 1,701 0 0 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4
23 1989 15–12 55.6% #69 1,744 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5
24 1990 23–22 51.1% #82 1,675 0 0 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5
25 1991 21–24 46.7% #86 1,661 0 0 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1992 16–23 41.0% #89 1,656 0 0 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1993 13–22 37.1% #119 1,631 0 0 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6
28 1994 6–8 42.9% #189 1,633 0 0 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6
29 1995 4–7 36.4% #187 1,614 0 0 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1996 1–2 33.3% #504 1,609 0 0 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patrik Kuhnen John Fitzgerald
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1989 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1990 13 13 26 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
28 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 64 119 46.2% 17 27 44 38.6% 19 23 42 45.2% 35 37 72 48.6% — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patrik Kuhnen John Fitzgerald
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18
20 1986 1508 110.1 — — — — +42 — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.37 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46
21 1987 1583 123.1 — — — — +5 -20 -85 43.9% -0.12 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 99.3 +0.03 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60
22 1988 1701 124.9 — — — — -76 -125 -46 53.4% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.7 +1.00 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37
23 1989 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 -105 -91 51.5% +0.12 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) 105.7 -0.67 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73
24 1990 1675 136.1 — — — — +17 +15 -18 48.6% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–5 (69%) 104.8 -0.51 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02
25 1991 1662 134.0 +0.64 -0.43 1.013 50.2% +11 -14 +54 50.9% +0.10 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 +0.13 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24
26 1992 1657 134.5 +0.21 -2.10 0.908 48.4% +18 — +40 43.8% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 99.0 -0.13 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81
27 1993 1632 125.3 -0.07 -2.17 0.909 48.4% +13 -44 +14 42.7% -0.49 5–8 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 98.6 +0.06 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51
28 1994 1633 115.0 -0.25 -1.36 0.970 48.8% -15 — — 40.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 +0.57 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14
29 1995 1615 117.6 -0.55 -2.86 0.797 46.5% +14 — — 37.0% -0.70 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.15 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41
30 1996 1609 105.0 -0.52 -3.09 0.820 48.5% — — — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21
Career — 1789 136.0 +0.15 -1.61 0.935 48.8% -1 -51 -18 46.8% -0.21 41–47 (47%) 54–51 (51%) 103.1 +0.09 — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.