H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patrik Kuhnen vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-1
Paul Annacone holds a 1–0 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1990 US Open first round 7-5 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 7-5 7-5 6-4 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrik Kuhnen | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |