H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patrik Kuhnen vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 1-0
Patrik Kuhnen holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Lundgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1992 Seoul fourth round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1992* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Patrik Kuhnen | 6-3 7-6(4) | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrik Kuhnen | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |