H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Patrik Kuhnen vs Tarik Benhabiles H2H: 0-1
Tarik Benhabiles holds a 1–0 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tarik Benhabiles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tarik Benhabiles | 6-4 4-1 (ret.) | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrik Kuhnen | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |