H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 2-1
Paul Annacone holds a 2–1 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1988 Newport third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1988* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 6-3 6-1 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1986* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 7-6 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1985* | Toronto Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Paul Annacone | 7-6 6-7 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |