H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Brad Drewett H2H: 1-0
Paul Annacone holds a 1–0 lead over Brad Drewett in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1989 Newport fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1989* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Brad Drewett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Brad Drewett | #1,018 | #34 | 170 | 1,763 | 181 | 225 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Brad Drewett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #187 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #133 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #133 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #75 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #163 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #99 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #151 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #583 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |