H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Chip Hooper H2H: 3-1
Paul Annacone holds a 3–1 lead over Chip Hooper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1987 Stratton Mountain third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1987* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 7-6 6-2 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1985* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Paul Annacone | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1985* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 6-1 4-6 7-6 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1985* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 6-4 3-3 (ret.) | Chip Hooper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Chip Hooper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |