H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Damir Keretic H2H: 0-1

Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1984 Sydney International round of 64 1-6 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Damir Keretic #129 1-6 6-2 6-1 Paul Annacone #94 Match data Dec 12, 1984* R64 Sydney International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Damir Keretic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1981 3–6 33.3% 1,476 0 0
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Damir Keretic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1982 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Damir Keretic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1982 1492 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.01 1979 1496 100.4 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 +0.34
20 1983 1534 110.6 +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 +1.07 1980 1477 97.2 +53 +20 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +1.39
21 1984 1584 121.3 -44 +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 103.3 +0.74 1981 1477 122.8 +42 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.85
22 1985 1883 150.0 +31 -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) 112.6 +0.51 1982 1618 125.5 +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 103.9 +2.82
23 1986 1783 144.2 +8 -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -1.82 1983 1528 123.9 -63 +44 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 96.0 +0.53
24 1987 1824 150.8 +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) 98.8 -3.01 1984 1574 127.4 +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 +0.03
25 1988 1785 136.2 -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) 97.2 -0.06 1985 1596 124.5 +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 +1.43
26 1989 1732 134.3 -17 +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) 91.3 -0.38 1986 1688 134.4 -143 +52 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 111.3 -1.30
27 1990 1651 127.7 +8 +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) 91.3 -0.79 1987 1694 139.5 -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) 103.2 -1.52
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 +0.29 1988 1538 120.7 -47 +102 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.6 -0.37
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 94.9 -0.03 1989 1576 113.3 -37 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.44
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% 0.0% -3.00 0.00
Career 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 1741 133.5 -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.