H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 2-1

Paul Annacone holds a 2–1 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1990 San Francisco round of 32 7-6 7-6.

USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Annacone #51 7-6 7-6 Dan Cassidy #144 Match data Feb 8, 1990* R32 San Francisco ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Dan Cassidy #237 7-6 6-3 0-6 6-2 Paul Annacone #42 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Paul Annacone #85 7-6 7-6 Dan Cassidy #158 Match data Sep 28, 1984* R16 Honolulu ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Dan Cassidy #753 #74 187 1,629 35 75 31.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Paul Annacone Dan Cassidy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1982 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1984 12–8 60.0% #126 1,629 0 1
1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1985 7–19 26.9% #219 1,509 0 1
1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1986 2–6 25.0% #274 1,511 0 1
1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1987 4–3 57.1% #106 1,565 0 1
1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1988 7–21 25.0% #227 1,515 0 1
1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1989 3–10 23.1% #140 1,456 0 1
1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1990 0–7 0.0% #381 1,401 0 1
1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3
1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Paul Annacone Dan Cassidy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0%
1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
1984 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
1986 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1987 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1988 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1990 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
1990 5 10 15 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1993 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% Career 23 41 64 35.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 11 12 8.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Paul Annacone Dan Cassidy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1982 1492 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.01 1969 1486 102.3 25.0% -1.00 -0.08
1983 1534 110.6 +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) +1.07 1984 1630 119.1 -17 +2 58.3% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 9–5 (64%) +1.87
1984 1584 121.3 -44 +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) +0.74 1985 1510 112.1 +51 -19 +47 31.4% -1.29 4–4 (50%) 4–8 (33%) +0.61
1985 1883 150.0 +31 -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) +0.51 1986 1512 118.0 +6 +35 30.0% -1.20 2–2 (50%) 0–1 -0.59
1986 1783 144.2 +8 -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) -1.82 1987 1565 111.6 -9 -18 47.1% -0.23 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) +0.25
1987 1824 150.8 +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) -3.01 1988 1515 119.8 +22 -24 29.2% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) -0.50
1988 1785 136.2 -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) -0.06 1989 1457 105.2 +10 37.8% -1.13 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) +0.90
1989 1732 134.3 -17 +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) -0.38 1990 1402 99.8 +26 12.5% -2.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) +0.08
1990 1651 127.7 +8 +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) -0.79
1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 +0.29
1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) -0.03
1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% 0.0% -3.00 0.00
Career 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 Career 1630 118.6 +19 -6 +20 36.1% -1.01 12–20 (38%) 19–26 (42%) 94.0 +2.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.