H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Dan Goldie H2H: 3-0

Paul Annacone holds a 3–0 lead over Dan Goldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1986 Philadelphia round of 32 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Annacone #13 6-3 6-4 Dan Goldie #264 Match data Jan 30, 1986* R32 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet
Paul Annacone #27 6-1 6-4 Dan Goldie #269 Match data Sep 19, 1985* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Paul Annacone #25 5-7 7-5 6-1 1-6 9-7 Dan Goldie #105 Match data Jun 26, 1985* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Dan Goldie #738 #27 457 1,855 122 117 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Dan Goldie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1984 7–4 63.6% #101 1,615 0 0
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1985 3–9 25.0% #265 1,603 0 0
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1986 8–10 44.4% #113 1,658 0 0
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1987 24–19 55.8% #50 1,765 0 1
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1988 36–19 65.5% #29 1,800 0 2
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1989 12–14 46.2% #67 1,735 0 2
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1990 24–26 48.0% #96 1,658 0 2
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1991 8–15 34.8% #181 1,574 0 2
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Dan Goldie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1987 9 11 20 45.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1988 28 12 40 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1990 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% 79 69 148 53.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 19 16 35 54.3% 20 20 40 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Dan Goldie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1982 1492 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.01 1983 1494 104.1 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.14
20 1983 1534 110.6 +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) +1.07 1984 1616 132.0 -12 -15 59.3% +0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) -0.33
21 1984 1584 121.3 -44 +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) +0.74 1985 1603 117.3 +16 -57 34.5% -0.90 0–1 1–2 (33%) -0.69
22 1985 1883 150.0 +31 -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) +0.51 1986 1658 131.7 +38 -102 43.1% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) -0.61
23 1986 1783 144.2 +8 -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) -1.82 1987 1765 144.5 -2 -38 52.1% +0.15 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) -2.01
24 1987 1824 150.8 +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) -3.01 1988 1801 136.5 +24 -130 57.8% +0.35 17–6 (74%) 10–6 (63%) -0.07
25 1988 1785 136.2 -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) -0.06 1989 1735 130.2 -17 -245 +91 47.8% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) -0.95
26 1989 1732 134.3 -17 +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) -0.38 1990 1658 132.5 +19 +189 50.4% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 8–10 (44%) +1.16
27 1990 1651 127.7 +8 +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) -0.79 1991 1575 122.7 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +54 +181 35.6% -0.95 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) -1.05
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 +0.29
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) -0.03
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% 0.0% -3.00 0.00
Career 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 1856 140.1 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +18 -98 +41 49.7% -0.08 53–37 (59%) 52–45 (54%) 107.4 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.