H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-2

Danie Visser holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1990 Memphis round of 32 7-5 6-7 6-4.

USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #190 7-5 6-7 6-4 Paul Annacone #48 Match data Mar 1, 1990* R32 Memphis ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Danie Visser #231 6-4 6-4 Paul Annacone #42 Match data Oct 1, 1988* QF San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Paul Annacone #13 4-6 6-4 7-6 Danie Visser #112 Match data Apr 3, 1986* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 9/11 of Paul Annacone's and 3/3 of Danie Visser's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paul Annacone Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 1991 3/5 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.0% 48.4% 58.9% 37.5% 58.0% 28.9% —/—
29 1992 5/5 12.8 9.4 52.7% 72.1% 45.4% 59.5% 48.1% 59.4% 35.5% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
30 1993 1/1 4.0 3.0 61.7% 75.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 61.7% 25.5% —/—
Career 9/291 8.4 7.0 55.6% 70.1% 45.7% 52.7% 39.2% 59.2% 32.2% 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1982 1492 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.01 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01
20 1983 1534 110.6 +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 +1.07 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1984 1584 121.3 -44 +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 103.3 +0.74 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59
22 1985 1883 150.0 +31 -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) 112.6 +0.51 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82
23 1986 1783 144.2 +8 -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -1.82 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53
24 1987 1824 150.8 +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) 98.8 -3.01 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1988 1785 136.2 -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) 97.2 -0.06 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1989 1732 134.3 -17 +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) 91.3 -0.38 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1990 1651 127.7 +8 +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) 91.3 -0.79 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 +0.29 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 94.9 -0.03 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% 0.0% -3.00 0.00
Career 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.