H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 3-0
Paul Annacone holds a 3–0 lead over Jay Lapidus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1987 Livingston third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1987* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 6-2 6-4 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1985* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 7-6 7-5 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1985* | Delray Beach | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |