Paul Annacone
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 6 | 9 | Oct 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Christo Van Rensburg | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 17, 1989 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 29, 1988 | H2H |
| Kelly Evernden | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 22, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Mark Kratzmann holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Kratzmann leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Kratzmann won the 1990 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Kratzmann | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data | Jun 21, 1990* | R32 | Eastbourne Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Paul Annacone | 6-1 6-4 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data | Jan 11, 1990* | R32 | Sydney International | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Mark Kratzmann | 6-4 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data | Jan 5, 1990* | R16 | Adelaide International | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,942 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,751 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,597 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1983 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1985 | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 1988 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1989 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1990 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 25 | 1988 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1991 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1989 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1990 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 65 | 124 | 47.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 39 | 24 | 63 | 61.9% | 55 | 34 | 89 | 61.8% | — | 27 | 52 | 79 | 34.2% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 25 | 24 | 49 | 51.0% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1454 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | 30.0% | -1.60 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.29 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1475 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | 41.7% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1477 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | 33.3% | -0.83 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.06 |
| 19 | 1982 | 1492 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 1985 | 1535 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | +64 | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.60 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1534 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -19 | +42 | 50.0% | -0.04 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +1.07 | 1986 | 1546 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -64 | +92 | 42.6% | -0.30 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.02 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1584 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | +79 | 46.8% | -0.23 | 2–1 (67%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | +0.74 | 1987 | 1543 | 116.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | -95 | +168 | 40.7% | -0.76 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.07 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1883 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | -175 | 59.4% | +0.45 | 18–5 (78%) | 22–16 (58%) | — | +0.51 | 1988 | 1541 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | -52 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.96 | 1–0 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.35 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1783 | 144.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | -28 | 51.1% | +0.27 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | -1.82 | 1989 | 1605 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | — | +108 | 47.2% | -0.24 | 3–8 (27%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | -1.10 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1824 | 150.8 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -239 | -27 | 58.2% | +0.46 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | -3.01 | 1990 | 1624 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | +93 | 44.6% | -0.55 | 11–7 (61%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | -0.25 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1785 | 136.2 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -161 | +14 | 56.0% | +0.35 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -0.06 | 1991 | 1539 | 113.9 | -0.13 | -3.85 | 0.855 | 47.8% | +3 | — | +151 | 35.4% | -0.92 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | +0.30 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1732 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +69 | 49.5% | +0.32 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–14 (22%) | — | -0.38 | 1992 | 1529 | 103.1 | -0.28 | -0.21 | 0.785 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1651 | 127.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | +106 | 44.7% | -0.20 | 3–9 (25%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 1641 | 101.3 | -0.79 | -2.06 | 0.687 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 2–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 1598 | 102.6 | -0.71 | -1.39 | 0.874 | 47.9% | +11 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.73 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 1585 | 100.6 | -3.42 | +1.40 | 0.666 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1942 | 144.9 | -1.04 | -1.30 | 0.788 | 46.6% | +6 | -164 | -5 | 53.1% | +0.22 | 55–51 (52%) | 72–77 (48%) | 97.0 | -1.22 | — | 1752 | 126.5 | -0.14 | -3.62 | 0.850 | 47.7% | -15 | -77 | +101 | 41.8% | -0.59 | 25–36 (41%) | 37–38 (49%) | 99.7 | -0.01 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 6 | 9 | Oct 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Christo Van Rensburg | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 17, 1989 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 29, 1988 | H2H |
| Kelly Evernden | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Simon Youl | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 8, 1992 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 12, 1991 | H2H |
| Pat Cash | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 26, 1990 | H2H |