H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 1-2
Mark Kratzmann holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Kratzmann leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Kratzmann won the 1990 Manchester third round 7-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1990* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mark Kratzmann | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1990* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 6-1 6-4 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1990* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Kratzmann | 6-4 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |