H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Peter Fleming H2H: 1-0
Paul Annacone holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Fleming in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1985 US Open second round 2-6 7-5 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 2-6 7-5 7-5 6-1 | Peter Fleming | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Fleming | #933 | #8 | 0 | 2,046 | 224 | 214 | 51.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Peter Fleming | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #120 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #116 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 43–31 | 58.1% | #26 | 1,953 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #13 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #99 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #32 | 1,765 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #174 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |