H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 1-2

Ramesh Krishnan holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ramesh Krishnan leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1987 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Ramesh Krishnan
IND Age 65 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Annacone #40 6-4 6-3 Ramesh Krishnan Match data Sep 24, 1987* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Ramesh Krishnan 6-0 7-5 6-1 Paul Annacone #35 Match data Sep 3, 1987* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ramesh Krishnan 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 Paul Annacone #85 Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ramesh Krishnan — — — 1,892 278 249 52.8% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Ramesh Krishnan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 6–5 54.5% — 1,537 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,584 0 0
19 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1980 14–11 56.0% — 1,713 0 0
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1981 13–16 44.8% — 1,755 0 1
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1982 22–23 48.9% — 1,741 0 2
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1983 20–21 48.8% — 1,749 0 2
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1984 31–19 62.0% — 1,842 0 3
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1985 23–21 52.3% — 1,805 0 3
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1986 29–22 56.9% — 1,845 0 5
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1987 29–22 56.9% — 1,790 0 5
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1988 28–15 65.1% — 1,757 0 6
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3 1989 21–17 55.3% — 1,717 0 7
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3 1990 20–21 48.8% — 1,698 0 8
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3 1991 9–16 36.0% — 1,583 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 1992 4–5 44.4% — 1,616 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1993 2–2 50.0% — 1,639 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Ramesh Krishnan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 1 4 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1982 7 7 14 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1983 7 8 15 46.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1984 15 7 22 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1985 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 17 8 25 68.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 21 11 32 65.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% — 157 119 276 56.9% 33 53 86 38.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 46 44 90 51.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Ramesh Krishnan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1486 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1537 115.0 — — — — +60 +16 — 54.5% +0.18 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1584 128.8 — — — — +55 -24 — 39.6% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.61
19 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01 1980 1713 127.2 — — — — -22 -93 -153 50.8% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.73
20 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.07 1981 1755 140.6 — — — — +40 -135 — 45.1% -0.38 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.22
21 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.74 1982 1742 139.3 — — — — +1 -23 -190 47.3% -0.16 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.02
22 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) — +0.51 1983 1749 145.4 — — — — +29 -115 -80 49.0% +0.04 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.76
23 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.82 1984 1843 148.4 — — — — +35 -224 -106 58.9% +0.72 11–6 (65%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.71
24 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.01 1985 1806 149.5 — — — — -2 — +12 50.5% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.37
25 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.06 1986 1846 139.6 — — — — +4 -288 +69 58.3% +0.70 7–10 (41%) 4–8 (33%) — +1.08
26 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) — -0.38 1987 1790 139.1 — — — — +43 — +30 56.5% +0.43 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.98
27 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.79 1988 1758 134.4 — — — — +24 — +34 60.2% +0.74 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.37
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29 1989 1717 136.6 — — — — +43 — — 54.4% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.03
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 1990 1699 138.1 — — — — +21 — +16 50.0% +0.07 8–10 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.38
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 1991 1583 123.4 — — — — -2 — — 41.0% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1616 131.3 — — — — +7 — — 40.9% -0.23 2–0 1–0 — -0.81
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1640 118.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.13 0–2 — — -0.39
Career — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 — 1893 146.4 — — — — +22 -91 -23 52.1% +0.18 89–85 (51%) 69–75 (48%) 97.4 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.