H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 1-3

Tim Mayotte holds a 3–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tim Mayotte leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1988 Miami Open round of 32 7-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tim Mayotte
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Mayotte #8 7-6 6-3 6-3 Paul Annacone #48 Match data Mar 17, 1988* R32 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Tim Mayotte #12 6-1 7-5 Paul Annacone #47 Match data Mar 21, 1987* QF Orlando ATP 250 Hard
Tim Mayotte #18 7-5 6-4 Paul Annacone #44 Match data Feb 7, 1987* QF Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet
Paul Annacone #20 6-3 6-4 Tim Mayotte #13 Match data Sep 28, 1985* QF San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tim Mayotte #1,103 #7 1,274 2,049 338 195 63.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Mayotte
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 0–4 0.0% #420 1,453 0 0
19 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1980 4–4 50.0% #171 1,531 0 0
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1981 31–16 66.0% #33 1,802 0 0
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1982 33–22 60.0% #30 1,810 0 0
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1983 23–18 56.1% #16 1,904 0 0
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1984 23–20 53.5% #44 1,766 0 0
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1985 48–19 71.6% #12 1,915 0 1
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1986 26–15 63.4% #15 1,857 0 2
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1987 44–13 77.2% #9 1,982 0 7
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1988 47–16 74.6% #10 1,918 0 11
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3 1989 29–15 65.9% #13 1,917 0 12
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3 1990 18–19 48.6% #37 1,747 0 12
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3 1991 12–13 48.0% #115 1,717 0 12
31 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,700 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Mayotte
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 11 5 16 68.8% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1982 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 11 7 18 61.1%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1985 19 5 24 79.2% — — — — 13 5 18 72.2% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 18 8 26 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 20 2 22 90.9%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 28 8 36 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
30 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% — 131 85 216 60.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 90 36 126 71.4% 112 61 173 64.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 9/11 of Paul Annacone's and 24/26 of Tim Mayotte's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Mayotte
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 1991 3/5 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.0% 48.4% 58.9% 37.5% 58.0% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 5/5 12.8 9.4 52.7% 72.1% 45.4% 59.5% 48.1% 59.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1/1 4.0 3.0 61.7% 75.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 61.7% 25.5% 1991 23/25 6.9 6.4 55.0% 73.5% 45.8% 56.6% 45.0% 60.9% 38.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 6.0 1.0 57.4% 63.0% 70.0% 33.3% 0.0% 66.0% 33.8%
Career — 9/291 8.4 7.0 55.6% 70.1% 45.7% 52.7% 39.2% 59.2% 32.2% — 24/533 6.9 6.2 55.1% 73.1% 46.8% 55.6% 43.1% 61.1% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Mayotte
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1454 104.1 — — — — — +42 — 18.2% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
19 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01 1980 1532 126.8 — — — — +56 — — 39.1% -0.43 4–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.12
20 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.07 1981 1802 138.6 — — — — -9 — -48 64.2% +0.75 6–6 (50%) 13–8 (62%) — +2.78
21 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.74 1982 1811 143.3 — — — — -28 — +49 57.6% +0.55 12–11 (52%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.18
22 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) — +0.51 1983 1904 151.7 — — — — -70 — +58 55.5% +0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–13 (41%) — -3.46
23 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.82 1984 1767 146.1 — — — — +46 -313 +156 55.7% +0.31 4–8 (33%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.63
24 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.01 1985 1916 157.8 — — — — +85 — +6 66.5% +1.07 11–7 (61%) 16–14 (53%) — -1.93
25 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.06 1986 1858 145.9 — — — — -38 — +200 63.2% +0.63 8–11 (42%) 11–7 (61%) — -2.66
26 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) — -0.38 1987 1982 154.9 — — — — +26 — +41 72.1% +1.58 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.87
27 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.79 1988 1919 150.1 — — — — +19 — +104 67.7% +1.13 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +1.19
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29 1989 1917 154.1 — — — — +8 -445 +83 65.0% +1.02 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) — -1.91
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 1990 1747 145.9 — — — — +38 — +168 50.0% +0.19 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.07
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 1991 1718 133.9 +0.08 +1.03 0.987 50.0% -19 — +211 50.0% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.69
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1700 100.9 -3.58 +0.76 0.994 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
Career — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 — 2049 154.9 -0.07 +1.02 0.988 49.8% +12 -259 +73 61.2% +0.74 89–83 (52%) 122–106 (54%) 95.3 -1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.