H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Paul Capdeville vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 1-0
Paul Capdeville holds a 1–0 lead over Danai Udomchoke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Capdeville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Capdeville won the 2007 Beijing third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 43
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2007* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Paul Capdeville | 6-2 6-2 | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2007* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Paul Capdeville | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Capdeville | #1,186 | #76 | 960 | 1,730 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Capdeville | Danai Udomchoke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #111 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #166 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |