H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Paul Capdeville vs Takao Suzuki

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Paul Capdeville vs Takao Suzuki.

CHI Age 43 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Capdeville #146 6-2 7-6(4) Takao Suzuki #286 Match data Jan 16, 2006 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Capdeville #1,186 #76 960 1,730 36 67 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Capdeville Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #455 1,484 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 2004 0–1 0.0% #305 1,456 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 2005 1–1 50.0% #148 1,535 0 0 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 2006 6–11 35.3% #149 1,530 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 2007 12–12 50.0% #102 1,700 0 0 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 2008 6–13 31.6% #111 1,631 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2009 8–14 36.4% #129 1,568 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2010 1–1 50.0% #165 1,482 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2011 0–7 0.0% #131 1,528 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2012 1–5 16.7% #166 1,525 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2013 1–1 50.0% #154 1,592 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Capdeville Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2007 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2008 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3%
26 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2003 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2013 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 21 35 56 37.5% 13 25 38 34.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 100/103 of Paul Capdeville's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paul Capdeville Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 1/1 4.0 11.0 51.9% 55.0% 35.1% 30.0% 50.0% 45.5% 31.1% —/—
21 2004 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.8% 56.8% 45.0% 55.6% 100.0% 53.1% 32.2% —/—
22 2005 2/2 8.0 2.5 56.5% 66.8% 49.9% 52.3% 34.9% 59.4% 37.6% —/—
23 2006 17/17 4.0 2.8 57.6% 68.6% 46.2% 49.6% 60.0% 59.2% 34.6% —/—
24 2007 22/24 4.7 3.2 60.9% 66.5% 46.2% 54.8% 38.2% 58.7% 36.8% —/—
25 2008 19/19 3.6 2.4 61.7% 64.6% 47.0% 49.4% 39.9% 58.1% 37.9% —/—
26 2009 22/22 3.7 2.8 62.4% 67.7% 49.5% 43.7% 36.4% 60.8% 35.7% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2010 2/2 2.5 4.5 64.5% 70.7% 43.9% 58.3% 44.4% 61.7% 42.8% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2011 6/7 4.0 4.0 61.4% 60.6% 40.9% 54.8% 67.5% 53.4% 36.9% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2012 6/6 4.0 4.2 60.2% 66.1% 48.1% 53.3% 43.9% 58.8% 34.9% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2013 2/2 7.5 2.0 66.2% 74.8% 54.7% 68.8% 75.0% 68.0% 39.3% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 —/— 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 —/— 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
Career 100/103 4.1 3.1 60.9% 66.4% 47.0% 50.4% 45.5% 58.9% 36.4% 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Capdeville Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1473 98.2 0.0% -2.50 +0.09
19 1996 1493 109.1 50.0% -0.25 -0.16
20 2003 1484 96.4 -3.13 -3.45 0.570 38.4% 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 +0.20 1997 1507 105.1 50.0% -0.25 -0.04
21 2004 1456 96.0 -3.44 -1.82 0.687 43.1% 0.0% -2.00 +0.22 1998 1545 118.3 +30 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 -0.29
22 2005 1536 113.6 +0.23 +0.69 0.926 49.3% 42.9% 0.00 -0.12 1999 1462 115.1 +53 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) -0.13
23 2006 1531 116.6 -3.29 -0.67 0.848 47.6% +35 -36 41.9% -0.61 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) -0.26 2000 1477 103.1 50.0% -0.83 1–1 +0.17
24 2007 1700 124.3 -3.60 +0.19 0.892 48.1% +27 -144 44.3% -0.18 5–1 (83%) 5–3 (63%) -0.51 2001 1517 105.7 +20 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) +0.26
25 2008 1631 119.8 -3.41 +0.96 0.904 47.9% +14 -7 42.0% -0.72 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) +0.55 2002 1506 104.2 +14 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 +0.27
26 2009 1568 123.0 -2.11 -1.83 0.911 47.7% +56 +29 -95 42.9% -0.45 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) +0.80 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 56.3% -0.13 4–1 (80%) +0.23
27 2010 1482 105.1 -0.04 +0.28 1.119 52.2% 50.0% +0.83 1–1 +0.15 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) -0.08
28 2011 1529 112.0 -3.82 -1.53 0.792 45.7% -11 +105 17.6% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 +0.02 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 -0.25
29 2012 1525 114.2 -3.63 -1.30 0.848 47.1% -24 +106 33.3% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) +0.19 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) +0.05
30 2013 1592 118.4 -0.58 +2.10 1.229 53.8% 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 -0.18 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 -0.05
31 2014 1583 96.2 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) +0.15
32 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% 0.0% -2.50 -0.10
33 2010 1546 106.1
34 2011 1528 98.4
37 2014 1512 99.2
38 2015 1508 95.2
Career 1731 121.9 -2.98 -0.45 0.885 47.7% +24 +3 -95 40.3% -0.61 12–25 (32%) 16–17 (48%) 94.8 +1.03 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.