H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 1-2
Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1992 Tokyo Outdoor fourth round 4-6 6-1 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 4-6 6-1 7-6(1) | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1992* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| May 9, 1990* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 6-0 6-3 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |