H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Haarhuis vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 3-2

Paul Haarhuis holds a 3–2 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1994 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #22 6-0 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #98 Match data May 4, 1994* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Paul Haarhuis #80 7-6(3) 6-3 6-1 Carl Uwe Steeb #56 Match data May 30, 1993* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Carl Uwe Steeb #33 6-4 7-6(4) Paul Haarhuis #62 Match data May 5, 1993* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Carl Uwe Steeb #31 6-2 6-2 Paul Haarhuis #34 Match data Jan 16, 1993* SF Jakarta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Paul Haarhuis #45 6-2 6-3 6-4 Carl Uwe Steeb #54 Match data Sep 4, 1991* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,930 194 192 50.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Haarhuis Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,632 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1988 22–19 53.7% #73 1,726 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,864 0 1
22 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,714 0 1
23 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,744 0 2
24 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0 1992 33–25 56.9% #29 1,791 0 2
25 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,719 0 2
26 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,608 0 2
27 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,661 0 3
28 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3
29 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Haarhuis Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 12 7 19 63.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 5 15 66.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 10 8 18 55.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 11 12 8.3% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
29 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9% — 65 59 124 52.4% 76 79 155 49.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 51 47 98 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's and 209/230 of Carl Uwe Steeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paul Haarhuis Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 51/54 2.7 1.2 61.2% 67.6% 49.6% 48.1% 45.2% 60.5% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 55/58 3.2 1.9 58.9% 67.9% 53.4% 64.4% 43.7% 61.9% 39.3%
25 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2% 1993 34/38 2.5 1.6 57.8% 66.3% 51.1% 55.0% 47.7% 59.7% 36.5%
26 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0% 1994 23/26 2.7 1.8 56.9% 65.4% 49.3% 60.7% 43.5% 58.5% 36.6%
27 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2% 1995 23/28 2.3 2.5 59.8% 65.0% 47.9% 52.5% 33.5% 57.9% 34.4%
28 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1% 1996 23/26 2.7 1.9 59.2% 64.9% 49.9% 49.5% 47.6% 58.7% 33.2%
29 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3% — 209/386 2.8 1.7 59.2% 66.6% 50.7% 55.5% 44.0% 60.1% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Haarhuis Carl Uwe Steeb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1500 106.6 — — — — — +53 — 38.5% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1632 137.8 — — — — — +51 — 56.8% +0.68 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.23
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1727 139.0 — — — — +24 -102 — 50.9% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.36
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1864 154.0 — — — — -24 -14 — 64.5% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.00
22 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04 1990 1714 147.4 — — — — +45 +75 — 50.5% 0.00 9–12 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.11
23 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.52 1991 1745 142.9 -0.05 +1.22 1.026 50.4% -8 +21 — 51.1% +0.12 9–10 (47%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.15
24 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.33 1992 1792 145.3 +1.00 +1.59 1.033 50.7% -24 0 — 56.7% +0.47 11–8 (58%) 12–14 (46%) — -1.66
25 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.69 1993 1720 139.0 -0.63 -0.51 0.908 48.4% -7 +55 -191 48.3% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.90
26 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.46 1994 1608 124.8 -1.75 -2.12 0.882 47.6% +102 -18 — 34.5% -0.81 3–6 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.49
27 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.40 1995 1661 130.9 -2.93 -2.02 0.819 46.2% +75 -78 — 41.2% -0.78 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.48
28 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) — -1.32 1996 1541 120.5 -2.41 -2.73 0.804 46.4% +38 +14 — 34.9% -1.25 2–6 (25%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.46
29 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) — +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05 — 1931 147.2 -0.63 -0.12 0.942 48.9% +17 +3 -191 50.9% +0.04 68–66 (51%) 57–60 (49%) 99.0 -2.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.