H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs David Prinosil H2H: 2-1
Paul Haarhuis holds a 2–1 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1999 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-2 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1993* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Paul Haarhuis | 6-3 6-2 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1993* | Kuala Lumpur (1) | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Paul Haarhuis | 6-2 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |