H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Diego Perez H2H: 0-2
Diego Perez holds a 2–0 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Perez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1990 Bastad third round 7-6 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1990* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Perez | 7-6 1-6 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1989* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Diego Perez | 6-4 6-1 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |