H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Grant Connell H2H: 0-1
Grant Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1990 Sydney Indoor fourth round 5-7 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1990* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Grant Connell | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |