H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 1-1
Paul Haarhuis and Guillaume Raoux are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on carpet, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1998 Moscow fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1998* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Guillaume Raoux | 6-2 7-5 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1996* | Jakarta | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(3) | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |