H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-1
Paul Haarhuis and Jacco Eltingh are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on clay, while Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1996 Toulouse third round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1996* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jacco Eltingh | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1994* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 7-5 7-5 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |