H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-0
Paul Haarhuis holds a 3–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1994 Philadelphia quarterfinal 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1994* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1990* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Paul Haarhuis | 6-3 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| May 30, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |