H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Haarhuis vs Jordi Burillo H2H: 2-1

Paul Haarhuis holds a 2–1 lead over Jordi Burillo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1998 Croatia Open Umag round of 16 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jordi Burillo
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #99 (w/o) Jordi Burillo #102 Match data Jul 31, 1998* R16 Croatia Open Umag ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jordi Burillo #46 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) Paul Haarhuis #31 Match data May 8, 1996* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Paul Haarhuis #56 6-2 6-3 Jordi Burillo #162 Match data Mar 13, 1993* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jordi Burillo #1,377 #43 887 1,728 91 129 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Haarhuis Jordi Burillo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #497 1,487 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 2–7 22.2% #157 1,484 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 18–17 51.4% #56 1,610 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1994 20–30 40.0% #122 1,585 0 1
22 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0 1995 18–22 45.0% #45 1,625 0 1
23 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0 1996 14–21 40.0% #99 1,585 0 1
24 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0 1997 8–10 44.4% #90 1,597 0 1
25 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0 1998 11–21 34.4% #148 1,567 0 1
26 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Haarhuis Jordi Burillo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 10 15 33.3% 13 18 31 41.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 6 8 25.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 11 12 23 47.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9% — 15 39 54 27.8% 70 79 149 47.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's and 189/219 of Jordi Burillo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paul Haarhuis Jordi Burillo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 9/9 4.3 3.7 51.4% 67.0% 52.4% 52.5% 30.2% 59.6% 33.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 30/35 4.3 4.0 51.1% 71.7% 47.0% 49.4% 47.1% 59.7% 43.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 44/50 5.6 4.4 50.5% 71.4% 44.6% 54.8% 47.8% 57.9% 39.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 34/40 6.8 3.8 51.8% 72.1% 47.8% 51.7% 49.1% 60.6% 40.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 32/35 5.1 3.1 55.6% 66.0% 48.0% 51.1% 51.1% 57.8% 37.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 14/18 7.1 3.6 50.9% 72.1% 45.8% 56.0% 39.3% 58.9% 38.4%
25 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2% 1998 26/32 7.4 3.1 55.7% 74.8% 46.1% 53.8% 40.5% 62.5% 35.8%
26 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3% — 189/220 5.8 3.8 52.5% 71.0% 46.8% 52.6% 46.0% 59.5% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Haarhuis Jordi Burillo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1487 100.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1485 124.2 +0.65 -2.93 0.834 46.6% — +45 — 31.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.58
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1611 133.5 -1.28 +2.37 1.069 51.2% -106 +63 — 51.3% +0.01 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.09
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1586 128.5 -1.91 -0.14 0.927 48.5% -89 +49 +49 42.1% -0.58 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.41
22 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04 1995 1625 133.5 +0.07 +0.28 1.018 50.1% -144 +92 -12 46.6% -0.04 8–12 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +1.27
23 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.52 1996 1585 134.5 -2.30 -0.37 0.881 47.8% -120 +113 — 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.41
24 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.33 1997 1598 128.1 -0.43 -1.19 0.935 48.7% — +108 — 48.8% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +1.03
25 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.69 1998 1567 127.8 -0.01 -1.70 0.957 48.9% -88 +96 +55 40.3% -0.60 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25
26 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) — +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05 — 1729 136.7 -1.03 -0.13 0.957 49.1% -106 +81 +37 44.2% -0.36 30–45 (40%) 28–40 (41%) 97.1 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.