H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs M. Knowles H2H: 1-0
Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over M. Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1993 Moscow fourth round 2-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1993* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Haarhuis | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | M. Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| M. Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | M. Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |