H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-2
Paul Haarhuis and Mark Woodforde are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1998 Shanghai quarterfinal 7-6(7) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1998* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(7) 7-6(4) | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Haarhuis | 6-2 7-6(0) | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mark Woodforde | 6-3 7-6(7) 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1994* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-2 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |