H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Paul Haarhuis vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-0

Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1997 Italian Open round of 64 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #51 7-5 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #32 Match data May 14, 1997* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Haarhuis Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0
22 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0
23 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0
24 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1
25 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1
26 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2
27 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2
28 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2
29 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2
31 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Haarhuis Todd Woodbridge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9% — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's and 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paul Haarhuis Todd Woodbridge
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/48 2.0 3.4 59.8% 67.3% 50.1% 57.0% 43.8% 60.2% 39.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 44/48 2.7 4.8 60.3% 69.2% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 60.9% 40.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 33/39 2.4 4.5 60.5% 67.2% 47.6% 51.3% 41.8% 59.2% 39.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 30/34 3.4 4.9 59.1% 70.6% 45.0% 55.4% 47.1% 60.1% 37.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 50/54 2.7 4.6 57.9% 70.2% 48.3% 60.0% 42.9% 61.3% 38.1%
25 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2% 1996 51/58 3.3 5.3 56.7% 69.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.8% 60.0% 39.2%
26 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0% 1997 42/51 3.6 4.0 58.4% 70.3% 46.0% 60.1% 45.6% 60.2% 41.4%
27 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2% 1998 36/42 3.3 4.4 59.1% 64.4% 45.6% 54.0% 46.9% 56.8% 39.9%
28 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1% 1999 17/24 3.7 4.1 62.5% 66.7% 47.9% 51.7% 49.4% 60.0% 34.8%
29 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3% 2000 10/10 2.3 4.2 60.2% 66.6% 49.1% 57.1% 52.0% 59.7% 39.4%
30 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8% 2001 10/10 4.2 5.5 59.8% 66.1% 46.9% 59.1% 33.6% 58.5% 39.4%
31 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3% — 360/470 3.0 4.5 59.1% 68.4% 47.6% 56.8% 44.0% 59.9% 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Haarhuis Todd Woodbridge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18
22 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10
23 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36
24 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85
25 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28
26 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11
27 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66
28 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58
29 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13
30 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55
31 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05 — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.