H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paul-Henri Mathieu vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 0-1
Arvind Parmar holds a 1–0 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arvind Parmar leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arvind Parmar won the 2003 Nottingham third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2003* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Arvind Parmar | 6-4 7-6(4) | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Arvind Parmar | #1,507 | #137 | 282 | 1,604 | 14 | 26 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Arvind Parmar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #183 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |