H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Paul-Henri Mathieu vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-2

Paul-Henri Mathieu and Guillermo Garcia-Lopez are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2016 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-4 6-4.

FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #27 6-4 6-4 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #97 Match data
Apr 13, 2012* Casablanca ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #80 6-4 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #394 Match data
Aug 12, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #27 7-5 0-6 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #54 Match data
Sep 16, 2006* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Paul-Henri Mathieu #54 6-1 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul-Henri Mathieu Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5