H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Paul-Henri Mathieu vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 2-2

Paul-Henri Mathieu and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2016 Paris Masters second round 6-2 6-4.

FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #37 6-2 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #67 Match data
Mar 28, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #33 6-3 2-6 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #105 Match data
Oct 27, 2007* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #24 6-2 7-6(5) Paul-Henri Mathieu #21 Match data
Jun 8, 2005* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Paul-Henri Mathieu #61 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul-Henri Mathieu Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4