H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paul Mcnamee vs Adriano Panatta H2H: 1-2
Adriano Panatta holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adriano Panatta leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Adriano Panatta won the 1982 Monte Carlo third round 1-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1982* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1980* | Palermo | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Paul Mcnamee | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
| May 29, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Adriano Panatta | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Mcnamee | Adriano Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 |
| 26 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 |
| 28 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 |
| 29 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 |
| 30 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 |
| 31 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 |
| 32 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 |
| 33 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |