H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Paul Mcnamee vs Butch Seewagen H2H: 0-1
Butch Seewagen holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Butch Seewagen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Butch Seewagen won the 1978 Cincinnati third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1978* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Butch Seewagen | 6-0 6-1 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Butch Seewagen | #826 | #87 | 0 | 1,679 | 67 | 83 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Mcnamee | Butch Seewagen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #200 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #227 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |