H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Mcnamee vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 2-1
Paul Mcnamee holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Mcnamee leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1983 Brisbane fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1983* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Mcnamee | 6-3 6-2 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1982* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Paul Mcnamee | 6-3 7-6 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Francisco Gonzalez | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Mcnamee | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |