H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paul Mcnamee vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 1-1
Paul Mcnamee and Ken Rosewall are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Mcnamee leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1980 Melbourne Indoor fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1980* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Mcnamee | 6-0 6-3 | Ken Rosewall | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1976* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ken Rosewall | 6-4 6-1 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Mcnamee | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |