H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Paul Mcnamee vs Mike Cahill H2H: 1-0
Paul Mcnamee holds a 1–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Mcnamee leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1981 Taipei fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1981* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Mcnamee | 6-2 6-4 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Mcnamee | Mike Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |