H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Paul Mcnamee vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 1-1

Paul Mcnamee and Ramesh Krishnan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1984 Hong Kong Open round of 16 5-7 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Mcnamee
AUS Age 71 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ramesh Krishnan
IND Age 65 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ramesh Krishnan 5-7 7-5 6-4 Paul Mcnamee #46 Match data Oct 26, 1984* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Paul Mcnamee #32 7-6 6-7 7-6 Ramesh Krishnan Match data Aug 25, 1984* R16 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Mcnamee #524 #24 0 1,900 229 217 51.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ramesh Krishnan — — — 1,892 278 249 52.8% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Mcnamee Ramesh Krishnan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1978 6–5 54.5% — 1,537 0 0
18 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,466 0 0 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,584 0 0
19 1974 0–4 0.0% #318 1,439 0 0 1980 14–11 56.0% — 1,713 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1981 13–16 44.8% — 1,755 0 1
21 1976 2–8 20.0% #174 1,413 0 0 1982 22–23 48.9% — 1,741 0 2
22 1977 14–18 43.8% #84 1,603 0 0 1983 20–21 48.8% — 1,749 0 2
23 1978 17–24 41.5% #120 1,654 0 0 1984 31–19 62.0% — 1,842 0 3
24 1979 13–13 50.0% #82 1,692 0 0 1985 23–21 52.3% — 1,805 0 3
25 1980 45–30 60.0% #40 1,882 0 1 1986 29–22 56.9% — 1,845 0 5
26 1981 14–11 56.0% #48 1,773 0 1 1987 29–22 56.9% — 1,790 0 5
27 1982 23–16 59.0% #34 1,827 0 2 1988 28–15 65.1% — 1,757 0 6
28 1983 38–26 59.4% #35 1,817 0 2 1989 21–17 55.3% — 1,717 0 7
29 1984 15–16 48.4% #61 1,726 0 2 1990 20–21 48.8% — 1,698 0 8
30 1985 13–12 52.0% #48 1,717 0 2 1991 9–16 36.0% — 1,583 0 8
31 1986 24–19 55.8% #45 1,707 0 2 1992 4–5 44.4% — 1,616 0 8
32 1987 7–14 33.3% #194 1,604 0 2 1993 2–2 50.0% — 1,639 0 8
33 1988 3–2 60.0% #456 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Mcnamee Ramesh Krishnan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 3 1 4 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1982 7 7 14 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1983 7 8 15 46.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 15 7 22 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1985 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 17 8 25 68.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1981 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 1988 21 11 32 65.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 1989 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1988 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 38 73 47.9% 103 99 202 51.0% 55 46 101 54.5% 36 34 70 51.4% — 157 119 276 56.9% 33 53 86 38.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 46 44 90 51.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Mcnamee Ramesh Krishnan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1486 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 1972 1492 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.19 1978 1537 115.0 — — — — +60 +16 — 54.5% +0.18 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.02
18 1973 1466 94.3 — — — — — — +35 20.0% -1.90 1–0 — — +0.37 1979 1584 128.8 — — — — +55 -24 — 39.6% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.61
19 1974 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +20 11.1% -1.45 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.40 1980 1713 127.2 — — — — -22 -93 -153 50.8% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.73
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1755 140.6 — — — — +40 -135 — 45.1% -0.38 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) 96.9 +0.22
21 1976 1414 106.8 — — — — +83 +98 — 21.7% -1.35 0–1 0–5 (0%) — +0.74 1982 1742 139.3 — — — — +1 -23 -190 47.3% -0.16 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 105.3 -0.02
22 1977 1603 140.6 — — — — — +58 -142 41.3% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.15 1983 1749 145.4 — — — — +29 -115 -80 49.0% +0.04 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 100.9 -1.76
23 1978 1655 130.9 — — — — -177 +90 -227 42.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 100.8 +1.07 1984 1843 148.4 — — — — +35 -224 -106 58.9% +0.72 11–6 (65%) 7–15 (32%) 97.9 -0.71
24 1979 1693 128.0 — — — — -194 +48 -201 48.4% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.46 1985 1806 149.5 — — — — -2 — +12 50.5% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) 104.3 -1.37
25 1980 1882 152.0 — — — — -89 -75 -120 60.4% +0.48 6–12 (33%) 21–8 (72%) 105.0 -1.40 1986 1846 139.6 — — — — +4 -288 +69 58.3% +0.70 7–10 (41%) 4–8 (33%) 94.6 +1.08
26 1981 1773 132.7 — — — — +11 -5 -30 57.6% +0.47 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 +1.51 1987 1790 139.1 — — — — +43 — +30 56.5% +0.43 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 98.2 +0.98
27 1982 1827 143.7 — — — — +32 -101 -6 56.3% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 99.6 -0.05 1988 1758 134.4 — — — — +24 — +34 60.2% +0.74 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 99.6 +1.37
28 1983 1817 142.6 — — — — -5 -26 +9 53.6% +0.27 13–6 (68%) 16–14 (53%) 102.7 -0.72 1989 1717 136.6 — — — — +43 — — 54.4% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) 99.1 +0.03
29 1984 1726 140.2 — — — — +31 +84 +45 48.2% -0.05 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 100.8 -1.45 1990 1699 138.1 — — — — +21 — +16 50.0% +0.07 8–10 (44%) 8–8 (50%) 96.7 -1.38
30 1985 1717 130.4 — — — — -26 +29 +129 58.6% +0.24 2–9 (18%) 8–2 (80%) 95.8 -0.11 1991 1583 123.4 — — — — -2 — — 41.0% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.2 -0.16
31 1986 1707 136.0 — — — — -61 +70 +161 52.8% +0.20 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 102.0 +0.28 1992 1616 131.3 — — — — +7 — — 40.9% -0.23 2–0 1–0 — -0.81
32 1987 1605 124.6 — — — — -22 +116 +204 36.5% -0.85 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 -0.58 1993 1640 118.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.13 0–2 — — -0.39
33 1988 1646 110.2 — — — — -17 — — 50.0% -0.30 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 — — — — -36 +35 -14 50.8% +0.03 63–64 (50%) 86–77 (53%) 101.8 -0.30 — 1893 146.4 — — — — +22 -91 -23 52.1% +0.18 89–85 (51%) 69–75 (48%) 97.4 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.