H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Mcnamee vs Ross Case H2H: 1-2
Ross Case holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 2–0 on grass, while Paul Mcnamee leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1982 Melbourne Indoor fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1982* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Mcnamee | 6-4 6-4 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ross Case | 6-3 9-8 6-2 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1972* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Ross Case | 6-4 6-4 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Mcnamee | Ross Case | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |