H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pavel Slozil vs Karl Meiler H2H: 1-2
Karl Meiler holds a 2–1 lead over Pavel Slozil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Karl Meiler leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Karl Meiler won the 1979 Florence quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1979* | Florence | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Karl Meiler | 6-2 6-1 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1978* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 6-1 6-1 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1975* | Little Rock | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karl Meiler | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karl Meiler | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,894 | 252 | 189 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pavel Slozil | Karl Meiler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 47–28 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #67 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #31 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #54 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #270 | 1,554 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |