H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pavel Slozil vs Sandy Mayer H2H: 0-1
Sandy Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Pavel Slozil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandy Mayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandy Mayer won the 1982 Hamburg third round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1982* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sandy Mayer | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sandy Mayer | #508 | #7 | 0 | 2,078 | 372 | 206 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pavel Slozil | Sandy Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #134 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #55 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #28 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 39–14 | 73.6% | #16 | 1,988 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,897 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,882 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,906 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #117 | 1,793 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,784 | 0 | 12 |