H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 3-1

Pete Sampras holds a 3–1 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1993 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Pete Sampras #3 6-1 6-2 6-1 Carl Uwe Steeb #27 Match data
Jun 3, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Pete Sampras #3 6-4 6-3 6-2 Carl Uwe Steeb #32 Match data
Apr 23, 1992* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Carl Uwe Steeb #40 6-3 6-4 Pete Sampras #4 Match data
Nov 1, 1990* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #5 7-6 3-6 7-6 Carl Uwe Steeb #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,920 189 190 49.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,615 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1988 19–18 51.4% #73 1,680 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,857 0 1
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,711 0 1
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,745 0 2
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1992 31–24 56.4% #29 1,787 0 2
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,718 0 2
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,607 0 2
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,660 0 3
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 — — — — — — —
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 — — — — — — —